Successful track record defending individuals charged with a variety of Criminal Offences.
Honesty and hard work are values at the core of Pav’s practice. You will not be misled by your defence and you can trust Pav to proceed while keeping your best interests in mind.
Pav prides himself on being available around the clock. This includes after-hours appointments and weekend appointments as well.
Fees are quoted upfront, with both block fees and hourly options available. Flexible payment plans are also offered.
Pav’s passion in Criminal Law developed very early, when he completed a Bachelor of Arts in Criminal Justice at Ryerson University. Thereafter, Pav attended Law School at the University of Leicester and obtained a Bachelor of Laws followed by a Masters of Laws from Osgoode Hall Law School.
Pav believes that being caring, compassionate, and competent are the hallmarks of a successful Criminal Lawyer. Pav has been providing the Peel Region, Toronto, and surrounding areas with professional legal services without compromise. Through his tireless commitment to your case and to your situation, he has rightfully earned the reputation of a local leader in his field. A commitment to integrity serves as the foundation of his practice, as does his continuous drive towards excellence.
Assaults, Manslaughter, Sexual Assaults, Human Trafficking, Child Pornography, Criminal Harassment, Forcible Confinement, Extortion, etc.
Careless Use or Storage of a Firearm, Carrying a Concealed Weapon, Unauthorized Possession of a Firearm, Discharging a Firearm, Weapons Trafficking, etc.
Theft, Robbery, Break and Enter,
Mischief, Arson, etc.
Possession, Production, Importing and Exporting, Trafficking.
Possession, Production, Importing and Exporting, Trafficking.
Impaired and Over 80, Refusal to Blow, Dangerous Operation, Flight from Police, Failure to Stop or Remain at the Scene of an Accident, Driving while Disqualified, etc.
Fraud, Forgery, Counterfeiting, Money Laundering, etc.
Talking from my heart here. Pav is an incredible lawyer, who saw my side of the case. He fought tooth and nail to ensure I got the best outcome. He got my charges dropped for impaired driving and Im forever grateful…
Hands down, he’s the best criminal lawyer in GTA, yet so affordable and down to earth. Had some serious charges which could get me deported but Pav came through…
In Ontario, Canada, a person’s first court appearance in a criminal case typically involves the following steps:
It’s important to note that the specifics of a first court appearance may vary depending on the specific circumstances of the case and the location of the court. It’s advisable for the accused to have legal representation at their first court appearance to ensure their rights are protected and to ensure a proper defence strategy is in place.
In Criminal Courts in Ontario, disclosure refers to the process of providing the accused with the evidence that the Crown intends to use in the trial. Disclosure is usually provided by the Crown to the defence at the earliest opportunity and is considered a fundamental aspect of the right to a fair trial.
There can sometimes be a delay in providing disclosure and the causes of delay in Canada can include:
If a delay in disclosure occurs, the defence can make an application to the court for a production order, which requires the Crown to provide the disclosure within a specified time frame.
It is important to note that the timely provision of disclosure is a crucial aspect of the right to a fair trial, and any delays in disclosure should be addressed by the court as soon as possible.
Section 11(b) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms is a fundamental principle of justice that states: “Any person charged with an offence has the right to be tried within a reasonable time.” This right protects against unreasonable delays in the criminal justice process and ensures that individuals are not kept in a state of uncertainty and anxiety for an extended period of time.
A section 11(b) Charter argument can be raised by the defence in an effort to have a criminal charge thrown out if it is believed that the delay in bringing the accused to trial is unreasonable. If a judge finds that the delay is unreasonable and violates the accused’s right to a fair and timely trial under section 11(b), the charge may be dismissed.
It is important to note that a section 11(b) Charter argument may not always result in the dismissal of charges, as there are various factors that the court will consider in determining whether the delay is unreasonable, such as the length of the delay, the reasons for the delay, and the impact of the delay on the accused’s ability to make a full defence.
In general, a section 11(b) Charter argument can be a powerful tool for the defence in certain circumstances, but its success depends on the specific facts and circumstances of each case.
In Canada, the decision to lay criminal charges for a domestic violence offence is made by the police and Crown prosecutors, and not by the alleged victim. While the alleged victim may provide information and make a statement to the police, they do not have the authority to drop the charges.
It is the Crown prosecutor who decides whether to proceed with the charges based on the evidence and the public interest. If the alleged victim does not wish to proceed with the charges, they may inform the Crown prosecutor, but the final decision to proceed or stay the charges remains with the Crown.
An affidavit from the alleged victim may be considered as evidence by the Crown in making a decision on whether to proceed with the charges, but it is not the determining factor.
If the alleged victim does not show up for the trial, the Crown may still proceed with the case if they have sufficient evidence to prove the charges beyond a reasonable doubt. If the Crown believes that the alleged victim is an important witness in the case, they may issue a material witness warrant to ensure their attendance in court. A material witness warrant is a court order that requires a person to attend court to give evidence as a witness in a criminal trial.
In general, the Crown’s decision to proceed with a domestic violence case will be based on the evidence available and their assessment of the public interest, regardless of the alleged victim’s involvement or lack thereof.
In Canada, there are several different kinds of sentencing options available to a judge, including:
Each case is unique, and the type of sentence imposed will depend on the nature and seriousness of the offence, the circumstances of the offender, and other factors. The judge will consider a range of factors when determining the appropriate sentence, including the offender’s criminal history, the impact of the offence on the victim and the community, and the likelihood of re-offending.
A peace bond is a type of court order under section 810 of the Criminal Code of Canada. A peace bond is used to restrict the actions of someone who is believed to be a danger to the public. A peace bond can be requested by a peace officer or by a member of the public. The person subject to the peace bond must agree to certain conditions, such as keeping the peace, staying away from certain individuals or locations, or surrendering firearms.
A criminal record check in Canada will show your criminal convictions and any charges that are still pending. It may also show some non-conviction information such as:
The information you obtain at this site does not constitute legal advice. You should contact a lawyer for legal advice regarding your situation. Contacting the office does not create a lawyer-client relationship. Please do not send us confidential information regarding your case unless a lawyer-client relationship has been established.